![]() |
|
Sight Radius & Sight Settings - Printable Version +- Historic Shooting Forums (http://historicshooting.com) +-- Forum: General (http://historicshooting.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Reloading (http://historicshooting.com/forum-4.html) +---- Forum: Blackpowder cartridge (http://historicshooting.com/forum-18.html) +---- Thread: Sight Radius & Sight Settings (/thread-622.html) |
Sight Radius & Sight Settings - TexasMac - 08-26-2013 Guys, I just posted a short article on my website titled “Sight Radius & Sight Settings”. If you’re interested in reading it go to http://www.texas-mac.com/Sight_Radius_and_Sight_Settings.html. Wayne RE: Sight Radius & Sight Settings - TexasMac - 08-26-2013 Guys, I was just made aware of why 36” is the ideal sight radius for a BPCR with a soule tang sight. Since many BPCR shooters these days speak in terms of points rather than MOA, implying sight changes in increments of 0.010" and assume that one point makes a change of 1" at 100 yds. Therefore the ideal sight radius is 36" rather than approximately 34" and the article needs to be modified accordingly. Regards, Wayne RE: Sight Radius & Sight Settings - Don McDowell - 08-26-2013 Front sight height plays a huge role in how many point/minutes/marks the soule or vernier has to use to get to any given yardage. You can take the same rifle , put 3 different sight heights on it, use the same load and get 3 different base comeups for any given yardage. RE: Sight Radius & Sight Settings - TexasMac - 08-27-2013 The article has been rewritten. Hopefully it now does a better job of reflecting conventional wisdom. Wayne RE: Sight Radius & Sight Settings - TexasMac - 09-25-2013 I just updated the article and changed the title to Sight Setting - MOAs vs. Points. Hopefully it now does a better job of explaining the differences. If interested, go to: http://www.texas-mac.com/Sight_Settings_MOAs_vs_Points.html Wayne RE: Sight Radius & Sight Settings - Old Jim - 04-29-2014 Informative read Wayne, thanks. As I have a 33.25" sight radius on my roller, my marks/lines of sight-adjustment for a distance are just that, lines or marks. Whatever it takes, is what it takes. Old guys got simple ways, Jim |