Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
smaller then bore slicks
08-31-2012, 09:51 PM,
#9
RE: smaller then bore slicks
(08-29-2012, 02:48 PM)Lumpy Grits Wrote: I know of more than a few who re-cut those bbls and wish they hadn't.
Have a new bbl put on or buy a Browney in '90.
Gary


Gary
The one's that recut the chamber most likely didn't know what they were doing using a bad fitting pilot and not supporting the shank of the reamer.
Or they borrowed a reamer made for a rifle with a different dimensions their chamber has.
I would hesetate borrowing a throating reamer made for a different rifle with out verifying the inside dimensions.

Kurt
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 08-29-2012, 01:10 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Don McDowell - 08-29-2012, 01:25 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 08-29-2012, 02:03 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 08-29-2012, 02:48 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Kurt - 08-31-2012, 09:51 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 08-29-2012, 10:14 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bobw - 08-29-2012, 10:52 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Don McDowell - 08-29-2012, 11:45 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by rdnck - 08-31-2012, 08:52 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 09-01-2012, 12:37 AM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 09-02-2012, 04:07 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 09-03-2012, 06:17 AM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 09-03-2012, 12:14 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 09-06-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 09-06-2012, 11:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication