Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Were they really?
02-08-2019, 09:56 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-08-2019, 09:58 AM by Kurt.)
#3
RE: Were they really?
In the past it was the shooter and his rifle on line. Now days we have a shooter and a coach on line. Take away the spotter the scores now days would be lower with most shooters.
When you look at the scoring hits those guys shot in the past, they sure looked good.
Tooling.....yes, now days tooling is good but I had rifles that had very good bores. Some times the softer iron used in the past for barrels had some benefits.
Also now days we use a rest to lay the barrel on something they didn't use back then.
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 01:49 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-08-2019, 09:14 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-08-2019, 09:56 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 10:22 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Gunlaker - 02-08-2019, 11:23 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 03:59 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-08-2019, 06:26 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Tom Herman - 02-11-2019, 01:43 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 07:58 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 08:24 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 01:39 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 01:58 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 03:41 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 04:34 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 05:48 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 05:55 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Caprock - 02-14-2019, 09:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication