Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baco Jim 442 500
12-27-2022, 06:21 PM,
#10
RE: Baco Jim 442 500
TGC I would be cautious about lenthening the patch, you're close enough to the ogive that much longer may not give you good shred on the patch along with chambering problems.
I've also found that the longer patches will take 2-3 minutes more elevation , and I believe can also result in an occasional unexplained dirt digger.
But as with everything shooting, it's something you can try and let the rifle and target be the final determiners.
A wise man can always be found alone. A weak man can always be found in a crowd.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-26-2022, 07:00 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by DirtySteve - 12-26-2022, 08:04 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by beltfed - 12-26-2022, 11:39 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 12:09 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 12:44 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Kurt - 12-27-2022, 11:36 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 12:46 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-27-2022, 03:41 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 04:47 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-27-2022, 07:57 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 06:21 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 06:43 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 07:54 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 11:51 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-28-2022, 08:56 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-28-2022, 10:40 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-28-2022, 01:25 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-28-2022, 05:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication