Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trying
09-07-2014, 08:58 AM,
#4
RE: Trying
Yep understand the cost factor. Also there is the recoil thing to deal with. With the 9 is it very light and managable. I perfer a 45 on the 1911 platform and that is more recoil and I think a little longer learning curve, but thats just me. There have been many improvements in the 9mm's over the years and they are a lot more accurate now than they used to be. And you have many many choices of launch vehicles.
I do have one, a clone of a Browning HP. It shoots but is no match gun. The only real complaint I have about the 9 at this point is them little bitty cases and fumbling around with them to reload them. I have reloaded .380 auto in the past but that was back when my fingers were quite nimble and such. Now not so much. If I shot it more, I would invest in a conversion kit for my Dillon to run the 9 through and make life easier. Last week one day I did set it up and run a box of .45's through it and I had forgotten just how nice that press was to run.
I think it will be interesting to see how you improve over time and as your skills get better and your groups shrink, which gun comes out on top accuracy wise. I think both are good. You just don't hear of much about the CZ like you do about all the other offerings on the market these days.
Take care
Sam
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Trying - by Creeker - 09-05-2014, 09:44 AM
RE: Trying - by Nuclearcricket - 09-05-2014, 08:28 PM
RE: Trying - by Creeker - 09-06-2014, 10:21 PM
RE: Trying - by Nuclearcricket - 09-07-2014, 08:58 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication