02-22-2022, 03:55 PM,
(This post was last modified: 02-22-2022, 03:57 PM by Distant Thunder.)
|
|
|
Distant Thunder
Posting Freak
    
|
Posts: 921
Location: NE Wiscinsin
Joined: May 2017
Reputation:
0
|
|
RE: Are the .44-77 BN and the .44-90 BN viable contenders in modern Creedmoor
There were actually a fair number of American .44 caliber cartridges including straight ones like the .44-70 Maynard, .44-75 Ballard, .44-85 Wesson, .44-90 Remington, .44-100 Wesson (3 3/8" case!), .44-100 Remington and .44-100 Ballard (from COW).
The big straight cases are impressive in their length, but it's the bottlenecked case that are the sexy ones! Just saying! Those were the .44-60 Peabody, .44-60 Winchester, .44-60 Sharps, .44-77 Sharps & Remington (my favorite  ) and the big boys, the .44-90 Sharps and the .44-90 Remington Special (not exactly the same case). Also the .44-95 Peabody. All of them look pretty cool with a paper patch bullet hanging out the front.
Jim Kluskens
aka Distant Thunder
|
|
|
|
02-22-2022, 07:41 PM,
|
|
|
Distant Thunder
Posting Freak
    
|
Posts: 921
Location: NE Wiscinsin
Joined: May 2017
Reputation:
0
|
|
|
RE: Are the .44-77 BN and the .44-90 BN viable contenders in modern Creedmoor
I really like the looks of the .44-60 Winchester. It looks like it would make a fine mid-range and silhouette cartridge. It would also work well for deer size critters.
It was apparently dimensionally the same cartridge as the .44-60 Peabody and may have been chambered in rolling blocks.
Jim Kluskens
aka Distant Thunder
|
|
|
|
02-23-2022, 11:23 AM,
|
|
|
Distant Thunder
Posting Freak
    
|
Posts: 921
Location: NE Wiscinsin
Joined: May 2017
Reputation:
0
|
|
|
RE: Are the .44-77 BN and the .44-90 BN viable contenders in modern Creedmoor
Sam,
I happen to have an 18-twist take-off .44 caliber barrel and a roller action, neither is doing anything a the moment. That would make a sweet shooting little rifle!
According to my book on cartridge conversion the base diameter in the originals was the same as the .44-77, .517-ish. However, if you're building a new rifle you could absolutely go with .45-70 brass as the base and have very little taper to the shoulder. Case is 1.900" so it would work fine. With a bore diameter PPB you would be able to load a bit more powder.
I think you could still use a .43 Mauser die for initial sizing and once fireformed you'd be good. I'm not sure if you'd have to shorten the die but no big deal either way.
I was thinking about the .44 Maynard for my roller, but it's just another straight case. The .44-60 BN would be way cooler! You got me thinking that's for sure.
I would make a cool levergun cartridge! And very effective as a hunting round.
Jim Kluskens
aka Distant Thunder
|
|
|
|
02-23-2022, 02:01 PM,
|
|
|
Kurt
Grand advisory committee
    
|
Posts: 4,246
Location:
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
2
|
|
|
RE: Are the .44-77 BN and the .44-90 BN viable contenders in modern Creedmoor
Jim,
I have a set of .44-75 Ballard dies, chamber and for the sizing die.
It is a .45 basic 2-5/8 long. It's a good caliber not far off a .45-70.
You can use the reamers if you want.
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.
|
|
|
|
02-23-2022, 02:36 PM,
|
|
|
Nuclearcricket
Senior Member
   
|
Posts: 515
Location:
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
0
|
|
|
RE: Are the .44-77 BN and the .44-90 BN viable contenders in modern Creedmoor
My plan is to put the 44-60 on a Hepburn I am working on building. I have a 17 twist GM barrel, also have a roller action in the safe waiting its turn. I had talked to the buy at CH dies a while back and he had told me to just fire form necked down 45 cases and I would be good. I am a skeptic so I had to play around and find out for my self. Well not having a 60 chamber I did the next best thing. I necked down a 70 case to where it would just fit in my 77 chamber, loaded it with a GG bullet and set it off. Nicely formed case, short neck of coarse but no issues other than that. Only problem I ran into was when I went to push the shoulder the rest of the way down, the taper didn't match and I ended up running the case into a 40-65 die to take a bit of the taper out of it. If the neck is a nice fit int he chamber your cases sound come out nicely centered. Once fire formed, just neck sizing should be all you need to do. If you feel you need t do more, spend the money and wait 2 years or so for CH to make you a set of dies.
If you have more than one gun in that caliber, either keep cases separate or run them back into a 45-70 die to reduce the body diameter.
One other thing I would like to mention is if you are thinking of the 44-70 Maynard, be advised that there are 2 different reamers out there for that. One is 2.1 and the other is 2.2 in length.
Just keep your 40-65 rounds away from your 44-70. They will fit and fire just fine. Then you get to spend the next 2 weeks mining lead.
Sam
|
|
|
|
02-23-2022, 03:39 PM,
|
|
|
Kurt
Grand advisory committee
    
|
Posts: 4,246
Location:
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
2
|
|
RE: Are the .44-77 BN and the .44-90 BN viable contenders in modern Creedmoor
Sam,
CH right now is so backlogged that it will take a couple years to get a die. I wanted a .38-50 sizing die and I was told that it would be 2 years or more to get it.
Just as well, I shot 500 corn meal blanks  and they came out perfect and load perfect in the chamber.
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.
|
|
|
|